Am 31.03.2021 um 16:08 schrieb Allin Cottrell:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2021, Sven Schreiber wrote:
> Am 30.03.2021 um 15:37 schrieb Allin Cottrell:
>>
>>
>> I took a look at geneval.c to see if by any chance the pointerized
>> version was already accepted. Answer: No. But it would be quite easy
>> to support the pointer version and revise the doc accordingly, while
>> keeping the existing form for compatibility.
>
> Sounds good! (Even though it adds another layer of version compatibility
> complexity to function packages, but I think it's better in the medium
> term already.)
That change in now made and documented in git. I think it's OK if
packages continue to use the prior getline signature, since the change
is really just cosmetic.
Thanks! - Yes, but if a package uses the (more logical, IMHO) new
signature, it will require 2021b, given your test above. That's what I
meant.
cheers
sven