On Wed, 10 Apr 2013, Henrique Andrade wrote:
 What do you think about naming the new window with the words
"session"
 instead of "example"? In fact, in my interpretation, when we open a new
 window that is independent from the others, we're starting a new
"session".
 Aren't we? 
I'm afraid that suggestion has its own problems, since 
according to gretl terminology you start a new "session" 
whenever you open a new datafile in a running instance of 
gretl. (Saved models are discarded, the command log is 
re-started, and so on). So the phrase "new session" doesn't 
really pick out the specific case of starting a new instance 
of gretl. I suppose the word "copy" (as in "new copy of 
gretl") could be used instead of "instance", if people think 
that's any better.
 Allin, is it too much difficult implement the use of capital letters
 (A,B,C,...) instead of the PID? 
Yes. It is subject to the same problem as trying to call them 
1,2,3,... I explained the problem in 
http://lists.wfu.edu/pipermail/gretl-devel/2013-April/004401.html 
It would be quite possible to get two instances of gretl with 
the same title -- unless we resort to overly complex and 
CPU-wasting contortions.
Allin