On 12/01/2022 23:51, Allin Cottrell wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Johannes Lips wrote:
> On 12/01/2022 20:45, Allin Cottrell wrote:
>> On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Johannes Lips wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> when trying to replicate the issue Sven faced in another thread. I
>>> came across
>>> the issue that currently the shipped addons are not built and
>>> installed in
>>> fedora.
>>> I am using the gretl spec file, which can be found at [1].
>>> I tried adding
>>> %configure --disable-static \
>>> --disable-avx \
>>> --with-mpi \
>>> --with-dbnomics \
>>> --with-extra \
>>> --with-geoplot \
>>> --with-gig \
>>> --with-ivpanel \
>>> --with-SVAR
>>> the addons to the configure command, but no luck. Could you please
>>> tell me how
>>> to build and install these addons?
>>
>> Johannes, the addons get built if you pass --enable-build-addons.
>>
>> I should explain: we didn't make that the default because the build
>> requires quite a full TeX setup. The idea is that if the addons are
>> not included in a gretl package for Linux, they should get downloaded
>> from sourceforge on demand.
>
> Ok, but then something else might be broken, because I couldn't
> install the dbnomics function package from gretl.
> When accessing File - Databases - DB.NOMICS I get the error message in
> the terminal:
> load function package: failed on
> /usr/share/gretl/functions/dbnomics/dbnomics.gfn
OK, we need to investigate that -- accessing that menu item ought to
cause gretl to download the dbnomics addon from sourceforge, if it's not
already installed.
> But I couldn't install the dbnomics function package from File -
> Function package - On server, because it's not present in the list.
That's expected, because dbnomics isn't a contributed package, it's an
"official" addon. Could you see what happens if you try under
/Help/Check for addons ? (Though that shouldn't be necessary.)
Thank you, this
worked flawlessly and I could see all the available
addons and was able to install dbnomics. Afterwards, I could of course
also browse the dbnomics database.
I will check how big of an issue the inclusion of them would be, when
building gretl.
Johannes
> Not sure what's missing or wrong here, but that's why I thought I
> should compile them for installing them from the beginning.
If TeX isn't a blocker, that would be good. But we need to see what's
going wrong with the other pathway (when the addons are not buit into
the gretl-for-Linux package).
Allin
_______________________________________________
Gretl-devel mailing list -- gretl-devel(a)gretlml.univpm.it
To unsubscribe send an email to gretl-devel-leave(a)gretlml.univpm.it
Website:
https://gretlml.univpm.it/postorius/lists/gretl-devel.gretlml.univpm.it/