On Fri, 21 Nov 2008, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti wrote:
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008, Allin Cottrell wrote:
> Second, it's obviously a matter of opinion whether it's
> "more logical" to have closely related items (e.g. the F-stat and
> its p-value) on the same row (as in Jack's B) or next to each
> other vertically (as in C). I find that my eye tends to group
> things vertically given this sort of presentation, so I have a
> slight preference for C in this regard.
I agree that to some extent it's a matter of personal taste. As
for me, I tend to "go by row" instead. If I was just interested
in (say) the F-statistic, I'd find it more immediate to look for
its row. That also makes copy-n-paste easier, if needed.
OK, here's one more go at it:
http://ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu/~cottrell/dougherty/table.html now
shows two variants of the table, one with primarily "vertical
association" of closely related stats and one with primarily
row-wise association.
At this point I don't have a strong preference. Any votes/further
suggestions?
Allin.