Re: [Gretl-devel] bandwidth default for nadarwat()

On Mon, 18 Jun 2018, Allin Cottrell wrote: > On Mon, 18 Jun 2018, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti wrote: > >> On Mon, 18 Jun 2018, Sven Schreiber wrote: >> >>> Instead I think this inconsistent input should throw an error. >> >> The way the code works as of now is that leave-one-out can be >> triggered by a negative bandwidth OR by the Boolean fourth argument. >> Perhaps you're right, we should raise an error in the case of >> inconsistency. Other opinions? > > I think under the new scheme a negative bandwidth should not be > accepted when more than three arguments are given. For backward > compatibility it could still be accepted, with its original meaning, > whhen just three arguments are given. Makes sense. Now in git.