Am 02.03.2021 15:11 schrieb Sven Schreiber:
Am 26.02.2021 um 10:51 schrieb Sven Schreiber:
> Am 19.02.2021 um 13:52 schrieb Allin Cottrell:
>> On Fri, 19 Feb 2021, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti wrote:
>> I can't think of an easier way of doing this, and your function seems
>> to
>> me a good candidate for "extra". One possible modification would be:
>>
>> function matrix unstack(series x, series names[null], \
>> strings S[null])
>>
>> where the caller needs to supply one of @names or @S, allowing for
>> the
>> possibility that there's no handy series holding group names and you
>> therefore want to submit an array of group names directly. Or, drop
>> the
>> @S argument but be ready to construct automatic names (e.g. "unit%d")
>> in
>> case @names is not given.
>>
>
> Jack, would you take care of pushing this into 'extra', or is further
> discussion needed?
>
Please, what's the status here?
Hi,
I asked Jack to think about the possibility to make this a (I think)
natural extension of my user-contributed "stack_data" package. But no
reply, yet ;-)
Artur