Am 29.04.2018 um 22:24 schrieb Cottrell, Allin:
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 12:49 PM, Sven Schreiber
<svetosch(a)gmx.net> wrote:
> Apparently somewhere it's hardwired that the pdf help file
has the same name
> as the package, only a different extension?
There is indeed a requirement that the PDF help file have the same basename
as the package; see section 3.2.3 of the Gretl Function Package Guide. The
relevant text reads thus:
OK, sorry for not re-checking the doc. I just assumed that if there a
"help" entry in the spec, then the purpose is to define the file name.
Two questions though:
1) Why then have degrees of freedom in the plain text case, the same
base name could also be required there.
2) Then basically all we need as a spec entry is "help = txt" or "help =
pdf". Or is it a matter of the path in a zip archive? (Although having
the help in the same location as the gfn could be a requirement just as
well.)
But it sounds as if there's a bug here: if you specified
"CSD_panel_help.pdf" it
seems that should have been converted to "CSD_panel.pdf" when the package
was built -- at least, if you built the package via the GUI.
No, that was done via gretlcli.exe --makepkg.
thanks,
sven