the attached file is the result from compacting monthly series to quarterly. When I try to compact further to annual then I don't get any options (average, summing, etc.). But I do get the options when I try other files. Is it because gretl is particularly clever (remembering the prior compacting method)? In which case I would find a corresponding message in the dialog window useful. Or is it just a bug?

Am 29.06.2014 02:07, schrieb Allin Cottrell: > On Sat, 28 Jun 2014, Sven Schreiber wrote: > >> the attached file is the result from compacting monthly series to quarterly. >> When I try to compact further to annual then I don't get any options >> (average, summing, etc.). But I do get the options when I try other files. >> >> Is it because gretl is particularly clever (remembering the prior compacting >> method)? In which case I would find a corresponding message in the dialog >> window useful. Or is it just a bug? > > Well, if you take a look inside your XML data file (use "less" or > perhaps "zless" on Linux) you'll see that the series named US48Temp > has the following recorded: > > <variable name="US48Temp" > compact-method="COMPACT_AVG" > /> > > So it seems that gretl is remembering what you chose last time and > is assuming it still applies. Maybe we should print a message, but > can you think of a use case where you'd want to use one method when > compacting from monthly to quarterly, and a different method when > going from quarterly to annual? > Well I'm not sure if it's very relevant, but in principle I guess you might want to have the last-quarter value, even though that was an average over the months in that quarter (in the case of interest rates for example). I see no reason for gretl to outsmart the user here. But my main point was that the user (who doesn't look into xml) isn't informed which method is used. It's not obvious that it's the same person that did the prior conversion, or that the user remembers what he did earlier, so I think the information would be important.