10:01 p.m.
On Wed, 4 May 2011, Sven Schreiber wrote:
it may seem strange that I'm asking about this after years of
gretl
usage, but here goes: I just noticed that I cannot save the ADF test
output in Latex format. This is in contrast to model outputs, where it's
a menu item. I don't know where else Latex output isn't available.
I think having Latex output there could be just as useful as for models
(the reason I haven't tried this before with ADF tests is just that I
have only relatively recently begun to employ gretl's Latex output
capabilities -- so it's not a sign that it isn't needed there IMHO).
Could it even be a design goal for gretl to make all tabular output
available in latex format?
It would be nice, yes. But It's quite tedious getting LaTeX output
just right for gretl constructions. And to an extent I've been
hampered by the self-imposed requirement that if we provide a
LaTeX option we should also provide an RTF option, for people on
Windows who want to paste into Word. Perhaps I should let that go?
Allin
10:04 p.m.
New subject: more latex output?
I am sorry about not having developed the RTF modules, but I still intend
to.
Seems that now I have more pressure to do that ;).
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:01 AM, Allin Cottrell <cottrell(a)wfu.edu> wrote:
On Wed, 4 May 2011, Sven Schreiber wrote:
> it may seem strange that I'm asking about this after years of gretl
> usage, but here goes: I just noticed that I cannot save the ADF test
> output in Latex format. This is in contrast to model outputs, where it's
> a menu item. I don't know where else Latex output isn't available.
>
> I think having Latex output there could be just as useful as for models
> (the reason I haven't tried this before with ADF tests is just that I
> have only relatively recently begun to employ gretl's Latex output
> capabilities -- so it's not a sign that it isn't needed there IMHO).
>
> Could it even be a design goal for gretl to make all tabular output
> available in latex format?
It would be nice, yes. But It's quite tedious getting LaTeX output
just right for gretl constructions. And to an extent I've been
hampered by the self-imposed requirement that if we provide a
LaTeX option we should also provide an RTF option, for people on
Windows who want to paste into Word. Perhaps I should let that go?
Allin
_______________________________________________
Gretl-devel mailing list
Gretl-devel(a)lists.wfu.edu
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-devel
8:26 a.m.
New subject: more latex output?
Am 05.05.2011 04:01, schrieb Allin Cottrell:
On Wed, 4 May 2011, Sven Schreiber wrote:
>
> Could it even be a design goal for gretl to make all tabular output
> available in latex format?
It would be nice, yes. But It's quite tedious getting LaTeX output
just right for gretl constructions. And to an extent I've been
hampered by the self-imposed requirement that if we provide a
LaTeX option we should also provide an RTF option, for people on
Windows who want to paste into Word. Perhaps I should let that go?
In the case of the ADF output (which BTW is relevant only if option
"show detailed regression output" is chosen) copying in RTF is already
there it seems. -- Well actually testing this on Linux with OpenOffice
doesn't really work; right now I cannot test on Windows and/or MSOffice.
Don't know about the other potential cases.
Apart from that I absolutely understand that doing tables in Latex is a
most annoying thing. That's why it would be welcome if gretl did it
instead of the user :-)
Maybe the way to go forward would be to use a different table format
altogether, say HTML? It's open, it's platform-independent, and since
the world is moving in the direction of web technologies, there are lots
of tools for that. Just a thought.
-sven
10:19 a.m.
New subject: more latex output?
El 05/05/11 14:26, Sven Schreiber escribió:
Am 05.05.2011 04:01, schrieb Allin Cottrell:
> On Wed, 4 May 2011, Sven Schreiber wrote:
>
>>
>> Could it even be a design goal for gretl to make all tabular output
>> available in latex format?
>
> It would be nice, yes. But It's quite tedious getting LaTeX output
> just right for gretl constructions. And to an extent I've been
> hampered by the self-imposed requirement that if we provide a
> LaTeX option we should also provide an RTF option, for people on
> Windows who want to paste into Word. Perhaps I should let that go?
>
With respect to this subject, a solution could be to have a generic
'tableprint' command that based on a table estructure (a matrix +
column and/or row names), produce rtf or latex output. Something similar
to what we already have for models (modprint).
I remember some time I have been looking for something similar to that
in the gretl command reference and thought 'tabprint' could do that, but
found that it serves for another very different thing, to print the las
estimated model in tabular form.
--
Ignacio Diaz-Emparanza
DEPARTAMENTO DE ECONOMÍA APLICADA III (ECONOMETRÍA Y ESTADÍSTICA)
UPV/EHU Avda. Lehendakari Aguirre, 83 | 48015 BILBAO
T.: +34 946013732 | F.: +34 946013754
www.ea3.ehu.es
4945
days inactive
4945
days old
3 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Allin Cottrell -
Hélio Guilherme -
Ignacio Diaz-Emparanza -
Sven Schreiber