2:11 p.m.
On Tue, 31 May 2011, Ignacio Diaz-Emparanza wrote:
It seems there is a bug in the function packages editor. I was trying
to
change some lines in an existing package that was formed just by one
function, but the button "edit function code" does not open the function
editor. I tried several times with different packages, and there is not
problem if the package contains two or more functions, but for packages
with just one function the button does not open the editor.
Thanks for the report, Ignacio. This is now fixed in CVS.
Allin
3:41 p.m.
New subject: problem with package editor
El 31/05/11 16:11, Allin Cottrell escribió:
On Tue, 31 May 2011, Ignacio Diaz-Emparanza wrote:
> It seems there is a bug in the function packages editor. I was trying to
> change some lines in an existing package that was formed just by one
> function, but the button "edit function code" does not open the function
> editor. I tried several times with different packages, and there is not
> problem if the package contains two or more functions, but for packages
> with just one function the button does not open the editor.
Thanks for the report, Ignacio. This is now fixed in CVS.
Allin
I confirm this is working now.
Thank you.
--
Ignacio Diaz-Emparanza
DEPARTAMENTO DE ECONOMÍA APLICADA III (ECONOMETRÍA Y ESTADÍSTICA)
UPV/EHU Avda. Lehendakari Aguirre, 83 | 48015 BILBAO
T.: +34 946013732 | F.: +34 946013754
www.ea3.ehu.es
3:38 p.m.
New subject: problem with package editor
¿Is it normal that the simple command
series x
generates zeros ? I thought it should generate NAs
<console output>
consola gretl: teclee 'help' para obtener una lista de instrucciones
? series x
? x
x
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
?
</console output>
--
*Ignacio Díaz-Emparanza*
Zuzendaria/Director
ignacio.diaz-emparanza(a)ehu.es <mailto:ignacio.diaz-emparanza@ehu.es>
94 6013732
*EKONOMIA APLIKATUA III SAILA (EKONOMETRIA ETA ESTATISTIKA)/DEPARTAMENTO
DE ECONOMÍA APLICADA III (ECONOMETRÍA Y ESTADÍSTICA)
UPV/EHU*
Avda. Lehendakari Aguirre, 83 | 48015 BILBAO
*T.: +34 946013740* | *F.: +34 946013754*
*www.ea3.ehu.es* <http://www.ea3.ehu.es>
4:43 p.m.
New subject: 'series x' generate zeroes?
¿Is it normal that the simple command
series x
generates zeros ? I thought it should generate NAs
<console output>
consola gretl: teclee 'help' para obtener una lista de instrucciones
? series x
? x
x
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
?
</console output>
(please, excuse for the previous message with an incorrect subject)
--
*Ignacio Díaz-Emparanza*
Zuzendaria/Director
ignacio.diaz-emparanza(a)ehu.es <mailto:ignacio.diaz-emparanza@ehu.es>
94 6013732
*EKONOMIA APLIKATUA III SAILA (EKONOMETRIA ETA ESTATISTIKA)/DEPARTAMENTO
DE ECONOMÍA APLICADA III (ECONOMETRÍA Y ESTADÍSTICA)
UPV/EHU*
Avda. Lehendakari Aguirre, 83 | 48015 BILBAO
*T.: +34 946013740* | *F.: +34 946013754*
*www.ea3.ehu.es* <http://www.ea3.ehu.es>
7:48 a.m.
New subject: 'series x' generate zeroes?
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, Ignacio Diaz-Emparanza wrote:
¿Is it normal that the simple command
series x
generates zeros ? I thought it should generate NAs
Hm, you may be right. However: is there any particular reason why one
choice should be strongly preferred to the other?
Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti
Dipartimento di Economia
Università Politecnica delle Marche
r.lucchetti(a)univpm.it
http://www.econ.univpm.it/lucchetti
9:02 a.m.
New subject: 'series x' generate zeroes?
Am 07.06.2011 09:48, schrieb Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti:
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, Ignacio Diaz-Emparanza wrote:
> ¿Is it normal that the simple command
>
> series x
>
> generates zeros ? I thought it should generate NAs
Hm, you may be right. However: is there any particular reason why one
choice should be strongly preferred to the other?
Yes, because zeroes look like valid data, which in this case they are
not. Imagine that further down you do something with x in a restricted
sample, and then revert to the full sample again.
There is a strange kind of zero affinity among the gretl coders it seems
:-) (think of 0*NA==0)
-sven
9:24 a.m.
New subject: 'series x' generate zeroes?
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011, Sven Schreiber wrote:
Am 07.06.2011 09:48, schrieb Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti:
> On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, Ignacio Diaz-Emparanza wrote:
>
>> ¿Is it normal that the simple command
>>
>> series x
>>
>> generates zeros ? I thought it should generate NAs
>
> Hm, you may be right. However: is there any particular reason why one
> choice should be strongly preferred to the other?
>
Yes, because zeroes look like valid data, which in this case they are
not. Imagine that further down you do something with x in a restricted
sample, and then revert to the full sample again.
Point taken.
There is a strange kind of zero affinity among the gretl coders it
seems
:-) (think of 0*NA==0)
Don't get me started on this...! ;-)
Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti
Dipartimento di Economia
Università Politecnica delle Marche
r.lucchetti(a)univpm.it
http://www.econ.univpm.it/lucchetti
4986
days inactive
4993
days old
6 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Allin Cottrell -
Ignacio Diaz-Emparanza -
Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti -
Sven Schreiber