On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 11:58 AM Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti
<p002264(a)staff.univpm.it> wrote:
On 18/12/2025 17:15, Sven Schreiber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed the following behavior of the invpd function: invpd(-1)
> yields -1; instead and as expected, invpd(-I(2)) throws an error about
> non-pd-ness of the input. Shouldn't this apply to scalar inputs as well?
Yes, IMO. I just pushed a fix to git. Allin, could you please review?
Looks good, thanks.
Allin