Hi, as nicely documented, the getline() function works with a source and a target argument, which are used as in: getline(source, target) Syntactically, shouldn't it rather be getline(source, &target) ? I thought that in hansl a function argument can only be modified if a pointer to it is passed. Compare the mols() or the eigen() syntax. Are there other functions with writable non-pointerized arguments? (In any case, the old form could maybe continue to be allowed for compatibility.)

Am 30.03.2021 um 15:37 schrieb Allin Cottrell: > On Mon, 29 Mar 2021, Sven Schreiber wrote: >> Syntactically, shouldn't it rather be getline(source, &target) ? I >> thought that in hansl a function argument can only be modified if a >> pointer to it is passed. Compare the mols() or the eigen() syntax. Are >> there other functions with writable non-pointerized arguments? >> >> (In any case, the old form could maybe continue to be allowed for >> compatibility.) > > You're right, it would be more consistent to require (at least > nominally) a pointerized argument for target. > > I took a look at geneval.c to see if by any chance the pointerized > version was already accepted. Answer: No. But it would be quite easy > to support the pointer version and revise the doc accordingly, while > keeping the existing form for compatibility. Sounds good! (Even though it adds another layer of version compatibility complexity to function packages, but I think it's better in the medium term already.)