Hi, what do you think about introducing a more self-explanatory command keyword for the coint2 command? I would suggest "cointjoh", hinting at Johansen's name. The "2" in coint2 is purely historical and path-dependent, and quite opaque. But of course coint2 can stay for backwards compatibility?

Am 06.12.2020 um 17:31 schrieb Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti: > On Sun, 6 Dec 2020, Sven Schreiber wrote: >> what do you think about introducing a more self-explanatory command >> keyword for the coint2 command? I would suggest "cointjoh", hinting at >> Johansen's name. The "2" in coint2 is purely historical and >> path-dependent, and quite opaque. But of course coint2 can stay for >> backwards compatibility? > > I like the idea. As for the new name, why not just "johansen"? Sure, why not!