On Mon, 7 Sep 2020, Sven Schreiber wrote: > not sure whether we discussed this before: I'm wondering whether it > would make sense (if it's feasible...) to allow something like "run s" > or "include s", where s would be a string variable containing sensible > gretl/hansl code. > > This might mirror the possibility of "outfile" to redirect stuff to a > string buffer instead of a file (since 2016d according to the > changelog). What's wrong with string substitution? <hansl> s = "gig.gfn" include @s </hansl>