On Mon, 16 Dec 2019, Allin Cottrell wrote:
On Mon, 16 Dec 2019, Sven Schreiber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> and sorry, here's another syntactic-sugar feature request. Couldn't
> seq(n) be made an equivalent short form for seq(1,n)?
> I know, only two keystrokes, but nice to read IMHO and in this context a
> 25% keystroke savings, hehe.
In my opinion, not so nice to read. Just today, when trying to understand
some R code, I had to look up seq() to confirm what seq(n) is supposed to
mean. OK, I could guess, but seq(1,n) is transparent.
me too
-------------------------------------------------------
Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti
Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali (DiSES)
Università Politecnica delle Marche
(formerly known as Università di Ancona)
r.lucchetti(a)univpm.it
http://www2.econ.univpm.it/servizi/hpp/lucchetti
-------------------------------------------------------