mailing list vs. forum
                                
                                
                                
                                    
                                        by Sven Schreiber
                                    
                                
                                
                                        Hi,
I know it's a never-ending discussion whether to have a forum or to use
mailing lists. So this is just a "ping".
First I've just noticed that you need 4 clicks to get from the gretl
homepage to the view of current threads in the list. And that assumes
that you know where to click each time. So I think one way to make the
mailing lists more "forum-like" (in a passive read-only) mode is simply
to provide a more direct access to the archives.
Secondly, Allin said that we might want to shop around for the most
suitable platform, instead of just using sourceforge. Ok, but where to
go shopping? Any concrete suggestions? I volunteer to check them out.
Finally, as the Wiki is de facto dead, I wonder if the link from the
homepage should be removed. IMHO it could be mistaken for the
(non-existent) forum and then creates a bad impression.
thanks,
sven
                                
                         
                        
                                
                                9 years, 4 months
                        
                        
                 
         
 
        
            
        
        
        
                
                        
                                
                                 
                                        
                                
                         
                        
                                
                                
                                        
                                                
                                        
                                        
                                        point size in gnuplot
                                
                                
                                
                                    
                                        by Sven Schreiber
                                    
                                
                                
                                        Hi,
here's a very concrete feature request: In gretl's GUI window for 
gnuplot there's still some space below the drop-down list for the point 
symbol (which applies at least to "points" and "lines-points" styles).
IMO it would be useful to put a box there to specify the point size; for 
example, a value of 0.5 would imply adding "ps 0.5" to the respective 
gnuplot command line. The box could be exactly like the one for 
linewidth, but of course would only be active whenever the point type 
selector is active as well.
As a more general remark, I've learned that with gnuplot 5 it seems 
easier (compared to gnuplot 4) to handle the data values that are given 
"inline" in the gnuplot file, by specifying a named "datablock". Stuff 
like shaded areas and so forth should be easier to achieve from gretl's 
side I guess. But Debian for example switched to gnuplot 5 less than a 
year ago (if I understand correctly, but could be wrong?). I wonder what 
an acceptable timeframe for gretl would be to require gnuplot 5.
thanks,
sven
                                
                         
                        
                                
                                9 years, 7 months
                        
                        
                 
         
 
        
            
        
        
        
                
                        
                        
                                
                                
                                        
                                                
                                        
                                        
                                        Special restriction syntax in VECM doesn't work anymore
                                
                                
                                
                                    
                                        by Sven Schreiber
                                    
                                
                                
                                        Hi,
I've run into a "matrix not conformable" problem, using the example 
restriction code from ch. 27 (p. 237 in my A4 PDF version dated January 
2016):
<hansl>
open australia
list vecmvars = PAU PUS E IAU IUS
vecm 2 4 vecmvars
# from here on code snippet from ch. 27 in user guide
matrix I4 = I(4)
matrix vR = I4**(I4~zeros(4,1))
matrix vq = mshape(I4,16,1)
restrict
R = vR
q = vq
end restrict
</hansl>
This is on gretl 2016a, and the hansl code where I noticed the problem 
first is not new, so I'm relatively sure that this used to work last 
year (as it should).
Any ideas?
thanks,
sven
                                
                         
                        
                                
                                9 years, 7 months
                        
                        
                 
         
 
        
            
        
        
        
                
                        
                                
                                 
                                        
                                
                         
                        
                                
                                
                                        
                                                
                                        
                                        
                                        gretl on OS X: El Capitan problem
                                
                                
                                
                                    
                                        by Allin Cottrell
                                    
                                
                                
                                        I've heard off-list from someone who uses gretl on Mac about a nasty 
crashing bug, and I'm able to reproduce it. It seems to be (a) a GTK 
bug and (b) triggered only on El Capitan.
To crash gretl: maximize a gretl window, then mouse up to the top of 
the screen to reveal the window controls and press the close button.
The crash may not happen every time you do this, but in my experience 
it happens pretty reliably if you try a few times. It may also be 
possible to provoke the crash by using gretl in OS X's new Split View 
mode. Apparently gretl is not the only program to suffer from this.
So, first, a word to the wise: to avoid data loss, it's best not to 
maximize gretl windows on El Capitan. Since gretl is not designed to 
run full-screen anyway that shouldn't be too much of a hardship.
As for a fix, I'm working on it but it's tricky. The problem seems to 
lie in GdkQuartz, a component of GTK that's written in Objective C 
using Apple APIs. Objective C is, to me, a strange language bearing 
little resemblance to C, and I'm not at all familiar with the Apple 
APIs. But I'm hoping we can piggy-back off work done by others who are 
seeing this problem with their applications.
Allin
                                
                         
                        
                                
                                9 years, 8 months
                        
                        
                 
         
 
        
            
        
        
        
                
                        
                                
                                 
                                        
                                
                         
                        
                                
                                
                                        
                                                
                                        
                                        
                                        ISI 2017
                                
                                
                                
                                    
                                        by Sven Schreiber
                                    
                                
                                
                                        Hi,
I've just noticed that the ISI (Int'l Statistical Institute) 2017 World 
Congress will be taking "Special Topics Sessions" proposals from March 
through August (2016!). See www.isi2017.org.
The congress will take place in Marrakesh (Morocco) in July. From 
personal experience with another conference in Marrakesh in the month of 
June some years ago I can say that it's very hot, but the heat is dry 
and the conference venues are AC'ed. I didn't even stay at an AC'ed 
hotel. The heat at the gretl conference in Berlin last year might have 
been worse...
I haven't been able to find any information about the conference fees, 
just a mention of "discount registration" by April 2017.
As I am now an ISI member anyway, I could act as the submitter of such a 
STS proposal. -- One caveat: This is all very fresh, I still have to 
make up my mind as well whether this is really a good idea.
Of course we would need a bunch of presentations, presumably about how 
great gretl works in practice. Whether or not that includes its use in 
teaching I don't know yet. Please tell me if you could imagine yourself 
participating in principle (without any commitment at this stage, of 
course).
If there are a handful of people willing to do this the plans could be 
made more concrete over the next few months.
Thanks,
Sven
                                
                         
                        
                                
                                9 years, 8 months
                        
                        
                 
         
 
        
            
        
        
        
                
                        
                        
                                
                                
                                        
                                                
                                        
                                        
                                        Gamma probability density function
                                
                                
                                
                                    
                                        by Artur T.
                                    
                                
                                
                                        Dear all,
I am just trying to replicate this MATLAB example of the Gamma
probability density function:
http://de.mathworks.com/help/stats/gampdf.html?requestedDomain=www.mathwo...
According to this, Matlab yields for shape=scale=1 and a x-vector seq(1,5) :
y = 0.3679  0.3033  0.2388  0.1947  0.1637
but with gretl I obtain correctly (just checked it with some statistical
tables)
y (1 x 5)
0.36788 0.13534 0.049787 0.018316 0.0067379
<hansl>
mu = seq(1,5)
y = pdf(g,1,1,mu)
</hansl>
Just out of curiosity: What is Matlab doing? (the same results are
obtained by Octave)
Artur
                                
                         
                        
                                
                                9 years, 8 months
                        
                        
                 
         
 
        
            
        
        
        
                
                        
                        
                                
                                
                                        
                                                
                                        
                                        
                                        .%
                                
                                
                                
                                    
                                        by Sven Schreiber
                                    
                                
                                
                                        Hi,
ok I admit I have no concrete use case for this, it is a purely academic 
question, but hey, for completeness: There is the pretty standard '%' 
modulo operation. Why not have the matrix elementwise analog '.%' as well?
I also note that gretl already allows negative arguments there, so a 
special error treatment for some negative matrix elements wouldn't be 
necessary.
cheers,
sven
                                
                         
                        
                                
                                9 years, 8 months