Re: [Gretl-devel] Midas syntax, small issue

On Fri, 6 Oct 2017, Sven Schreiber wrote:

> Could it be that the "almonp" variant was overlooked here? > > I have a case here with a term mdsl(dIPL, "almonp", theta1) which > works OK like this, but which fails if I remove the explicit 'theta1' > in there. > With the other spec cases it works fine. The point here is that as things stand we're not willing to guess how many terms you want in your Almon polynomial (while with NEAlmon and beta there's a clear presumption of two parameters as default).