Re: [Gretl-devel] Belated response to Sven on function packages

On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Sven Schreiber wrote:

>> - P's public interface (which should have the same name as the >> package) will _not_ appear as packageable. That's intentional: >> it's already packaged and shouldn't appear as the public interface >> of any other package. > Can you remind me again why the names should match? Urgh, I have to remind myself first! > Couldn't the name of the public interface function be completely > invisible to the package user... Then you'd only be able to call them from the GUI, not from scripts. I don't think we want that.