Am 24.07.2024 um 22:45 schrieb Cottrell, Allin:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 4:22 PM Sven Schreiber
<sven.schreiber(a)fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> is the "no_const" specification for the ui-maker apparatus for a
> function package GUI really working as intended? I seem to have a case
> where I have a ui-maker function that requests no_const for a list
> argument X, but I can execute the function with X = const alright. BTW,
> X is set to have a "null" default, if that matters. Or does no_const
> really mean that any constant term is removed quietly?
>
> I don't have time to give a minimal example right now, but I could do so
> on Friday or so, if necessary.
Please do. This may be redundant, but of course the "no_const"
specification only applies to GUI usage.
Will do, and yes, GUI context.
Another thing I think I just saw is that in the bundle-plot function of
a package I had object identifiers that weren't declared.
(copy-and-paste mistake) But I never got any gretl syntax error message
about it; well, I haven't checked stderr, maybe that's where they went...
thanks
sven