On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Gordon Hughes wrote:
An edited version of the report follows:
"However, in experimenting with it I have come across what
appears to be a bug associated with the introduction of the
--numeric option....
I'm trying to investigate this, using your sfa_mod function
package. I've hit a couple of problems at this point.
1) The sample script given in the documentation for the sfa_mod
package includes the line
include sfa_mod.inp
which generates an error. I presume this ought to be "include
sfa_mod.gfn"?
2) If I "correct" the above as indicated, I then get a further
error:
series upred = sfa_eff(
The symbol 'sfa_eff' is
undefined
It's obviously important that the sample script that accompanies a
function package should run. I'll see if I can add a check on
that point to the mechanism for accepting a function upload.
Allin