3:24 p.m.
I am trying to compile Gretl 1.8.4 on Mac OS X Snow Leopard.
I do this without using anything from Fink or MacPorts.
With Leopard this went smoothly.
However on Snow Leopard Gretl's libtool generates an error.
The error is that /usr/lib/libiconv.la cannot be found.
(In addition there is also no /usr/lib/libxml2.la)
Apparently in Snow Leopard there are no .la files for anything that
is in /usr/lib.
What could be a solution?
Berend
3:50 p.m.
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009, Berend Hasselman wrote:
I am trying to compile Gretl 1.8.4 on Mac OS X Snow Leopard.
I do this without using anything from Fink or MacPorts.
With Leopard this went smoothly.
However on Snow Leopard Gretl's libtool generates an error.
The error is that /usr/lib/libiconv.la cannot be found.
(In addition there is also no /usr/lib/libxml2.la)
Apparently in Snow Leopard there are no .la files for anything that
is in /usr/lib.
What could be a solution?
I see
( google: "snow leopard libtool missing .la files" )
that the Fink and MacPorts people have run into this too. I find
the discussions confusing and I'm not sure yet what the right
solution is.
Allin
8:30 p.m.
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009, Berend Hasselman wrote:
Apparently in Snow Leopard there are no .la files for anything that
is in /usr/lib.
What could be a solution?
I've updated the libtool-related files in gretl CVS to libtool
version 2.2.6. You might see if that makes any difference.
Allin
6:40 a.m.
On 05-09-2009, at 22:30, Allin Cottrell wrote:
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009, Berend Hasselman wrote:
> Apparently in Snow Leopard there are no .la files for anything that
> is in /usr/lib.
> What could be a solution?
I've updated the libtool-related files in gretl CVS to libtool
version 2.2.6. You might see if that makes any difference.
Regrettably, no difference. Same error message.
It will have to wait until someone comes up with a solution.
My knowledge of these matters is too limited.
Berend
8:13 a.m.
On 05-09-2009, at 22:30, Allin Cottrell wrote:
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009, Berend Hasselman wrote:
> Apparently in Snow Leopard there are no .la files for anything that
> is in /usr/lib.
> What could be a solution?
I've updated the libtool-related files in gretl CVS to libtool
version 2.2.6. You might see if that makes any difference.
Just some more information.
In the past, I have also been able to build Gnumeric on Mac OS X
Leopard and build a Gnumeric.app.
On Snow Leopard this now also fails with a message similar to that
with Gretl:
libtool: link: `/usr/X11/lib/libXrender.la' is not a valid libtool
archive
All broken. Haven't got a clue.
Berend
9:39 a.m.
On 05-09-2009, at 17:50, Allin Cottrell wrote:
I see
( google: "snow leopard libtool missing .la files" )
that the Fink and MacPorts people have run into this too. I find
the discussions confusing and I'm not sure yet what the right
solution is.
I left out the missing.
And got these
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--Fink-users--10.6-32bit-and-fontconfig2-dev-b...
http://www.nabble.com/Re:--Fink-users--pb-with-libtool-and-X11-libraries-...
Apple has not provided any .la files.
There is a script to generate .la files but for the time being I'm
going to wait.
Berend
1:14 p.m.
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009, Berend Hasselman wrote:
On 05-09-2009, at 22:30, Allin Cottrell wrote:
>
> On Sat, 5 Sep 2009, Berend Hasselman wrote:
>
>> Apparently in Snow Leopard there are no .la files for anything that
>> is in /usr/lib.
>> What could be a solution?
>
> I've updated the libtool-related files in gretl CVS to libtool
> version 2.2.6. You might see if that makes any difference.
Regrettably, no difference. Same error message.
It will have to wait until someone comes up with a solution.
My knowledge of these matters is too limited.
Are you sure you have a compatible version of Xcode for OS X 10.6?
It would seem surprising if Apple has broken support for libtool,
since it's the de facto standard build mechanism for libraries in
the free software world.
Allin.
1:17 p.m.
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009, Berend Hasselman wrote:
In the past, I have also been able to build Gnumeric on Mac OS X
Leopard and build a Gnumeric.app.
On Snow Leopard this now also fails with a message similar to that
with Gretl:
libtool: link: `/usr/X11/lib/libXrender.la' is not a valid libtool
archive
Does that file exist? If so, what does it look like?
Allin.
1:30 p.m.
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009, Berend Hasselman wrote:
On 05-09-2009, at 17:50, Allin Cottrell wrote:
> I see
>
> ( google: "snow leopard libtool missing .la files" )
>
> that the Fink and MacPorts people have run into this too. I find
> the discussions confusing and I'm not sure yet what the right
> solution is.
I left out the missing.
And got these
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--Fink-users--10.6-32bit-and-fontconfig2-dev-b...
http://www.nabble.com/Re:--Fink-users--pb-with-libtool-and-X11-libraries-...
Apple has not provided any .la files.
The first of these is quite useful. I think I may understand a
bit better now. It seems that for libtool to work you need either
all the relevant .la files or none. The show-stopper is not just
that certain .la files don't exist any more on OS X, but that
these non-existent files are referenced in other .la files.
You could try this experiment: go to
/Library/Frameworks/GTK+.framework/Resources/lib
and (probably after backing them up) delete all the *.la files in
that directory. Also (if necessary) track down and delete any .la
files in other directories from which libraries are pulled into
the gretl build (in my case that would include /usr/local/lib).
Then try running gretl's configure script again and see if make
works.
Allin.
1:55 p.m.
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009, Allin Cottrell wrote:
You could try this experiment: go to
/Library/Frameworks/GTK+.framework/Resources/lib
and (probably after backing them up) delete all the *.la files in
that directory. Also (if necessary) track down and delete any .la
files in other directories from which libraries are pulled into
the gretl build (in my case that would include /usr/local/lib).
Then try running gretl's configure script again and see if make
works.
I can't test on 10.6, but I tried a related experiment on 10.4.11.
cd /Library/Frameworks/GTK+.framework
tar cvfz ~/la.tgz `find . -name "*.la"`
sudo find . -name "*.la" | xargs rm
Then I went to the gretl source and did
./configure <options>
make clean
make
This worked OK. (The "make clean" step was required, to flush out
references to the GTK+ .la files.)
Allin.
6:35 p.m.
The solution for compiling Gretl on Snow Leopard is as follows:
1. delete all .la files in the GTK+.framework
Needed since Apple has removed many/all .la files from /usr./lib
2. define CC="gcc -arch i386" for configure.
This is absolutely required since on Snow Leopard the default is 64
bits.
And everything compiled must be 32 bits for Gretl to work.
The CC define is the only way to get consistent 32bits compile and
link.
There is no need to modify anything in the source tarball.
I got this from a message from Urbanek to the R-SIG_Mac mailing list.
Berend
7:17 p.m.
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, Berend Hasselman wrote:
The solution for compiling Gretl on Snow Leopard is as follows:
1. delete all .la files in the GTK+.framework
Needed since Apple has removed many/all .la files from /usr./lib
OK, I'm glad that works.
2. define CC="gcc -arch i386" for configure.
This is absolutely required since on Snow Leopard the default is 64
bits.
And everything compiled must be 32 bits for Gretl to work.
What's the problem with building a 64-bit gretl on OS X? That
seems to work OK on Linux. Your dependency libs would have to be
64-bit too, but I think the GTK+ Framework has all 3 architectures
embedded, doesn't it?
Allin.
7:35 p.m.
On 10-09-2009, at 21:17, Allin Cottrell wrote:
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, Berend Hasselman wrote:
> ....
> 2. define CC="gcc -arch i386" for configure.
>
> This is absolutely required since on Snow Leopard the default is 64
> bits.
> And everything compiled must be 32 bits for Gretl to work.
What's the problem with building a 64-bit gretl on OS X? That
seems to work OK on Linux. Your dependency libs would have to be
64-bit too, but I think the GTK+ Framework has all 3 architectures
embedded, doesn't it?
No. 2 architectures. i386 and ppc only.
That is what file says.
Berend
7:41 p.m.
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009, Berend Hasselman wrote:
On 10-09-2009, at 21:17, Allin Cottrell wrote:
> What's the problem with building a 64-bit gretl on OS X? That
> seems to work OK on Linux. Your dependency libs would have to be
> 64-bit too, but I think the GTK+ Framework has all 3 architectures
> embedded, doesn't it?
No. 2 architectures. i386 and ppc only.
That is what file says.
In that case, yes, 64-bits is out.
Allin
5340
days inactive
5345
days old
13 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Allin Cottrell -
Berend Hasselman