Am 24.10.2017 um 16:51 schrieb Artur Tarassow:
Am 24.10.2017 um 16:45 schrieb Sven Schreiber:
> Yes, well, but it's an old handout, and is that actually used
in his
> current production code? Those people make mistakes, too, you know.
Yes, of course. Guess we should correct this (potential bug) in SB() then.
For the record: I am not sure it is a bug, I'm just asking, because it
seemed to me that it _might_ be a bug. I don't claim to be an expert for
the underlying conceptual algorithm.
I guess it would be useful if Stefano could weigh in. The question is,
is the new SB() code equivalent to the old SBslow() code in terms of
output, apart from any speed concerns.
thanks,
sven