Hello Daniel, It seems that either you're not monitoring the hotmail address that you used when uploading your package, or perhaps the response (from Sven Schreiber) has gone to your spam. Anyway, here's what Sven wrote on February 7 (with daniel.ventosa(a)hotmail.com among the recipients): <quote> Am 06.02.2020 um 18:38 schrieb gretl(a)ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu: Hi Daniel, the sample script is broken (missing commenting-out of the asterisks for example). Apart from that, my question about the earlier version 1.0 remains: What's the difference with respect to gretl's omit command? It would be nice if you could acknowledge receipt of this email. </quote> Allin Cottrell On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 7:29 PM Daniel Ventosa-Santaulària <daniel.ventosa(a)cide.edu&gt; wrote: > > Hello, > I recently submitted a package, G2S, to the Gretl team. I never received neither feedback nor acceptance/rejection of our proposal. The package G2S is a simple General-2-Specific program, that sequentially eliminates the non significant variables until only significant ones remain. There are some nice features; the code ensures that there are no problems with potencial colinearities (Gretl already does a lot in this sense, but our packages goes further down on this). The package also allows to fix some variables (this is, to exclude some variables from the algorithm), etc. Is this the right email address to make inquiries about a lost submitted package? > Friendly regards, > Daniel