Am 22.12.2010 15:37, schrieb Allin Cottrell:
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010, Sven Schreiber wrote:
> I don't remember if there was a discussion on this (Jack's wiki?), but
> maybe 'hsk' is a candidate for deprecation, in favor of 'ols ..
> or something like that?
> Haven't thought this through, but it strikes me as quite special to have
> its own command.
I don't have strong feelings about "hsk", but I don't think an
option to "ols" works as an alternative, since it's not a case of
OLS. We consolidated the FGLS variants for AR(1) estimation, which
used to have their own commands at one time, under a common "ar1"
command, but I don't see a "natural" place to consolidate hsk.
you're right that suggesting 'ols' was kind of stupid (my words, not
yours). But what about 'wls' then?
I don't have any feelings about hsk, either, it's just a spontaneous
idea to keep the command namespace relatively clean.