On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti wrote:
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Allin Cottrell wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, andreas.rosenblad(a)ltv.se wrote:
> > Would it be terribly difficult to let gretl allow longer
> > variable lengths?
> Yes. Basically, it would require that all output-formatting
> routines be re-written from scratch. With 15-character variable
> names we're at the limit of what we can support using the current
> formats, and given a sensible maximum line length of around 80
...which begs the question: is the 80-column limit
anachronistic? Please note that mine isn't a rhetorical
I do agree on the fact that very wide output is unreadable
anyway, but the 80-character limit is in itself a legacy of the
punched card era.
As I see it, it's mostly a readability issue; and there's also the
matter of printability: even today, paper is of a finite width!
However, to address Andreas's subsequent question: yes, it would
be possible to allow longer names for scalars and matrices without
having to redo all the printing functions. It would be tricky
though. Perhaps after 1.6.6.