Am 03.01.2021 um 18:15 schrieb Allin Cottrell:
On Sun, 3 Jan 2021, Sven Schreiber wrote:
> Am 03.01.2021 um 17:30 schrieb Sven Schreiber:
> which means that the return value will always be 1 if the assert
> level is set to off (zero). Is this really the supposed design?
> Also, further down I think there may be another bug. No return value is
> assigned if the warning level is at least 1 and the expression is
> actually true. And indeed I get:
> ? set assert warn
> ? eval assert(1==1)
> At least not a very subtle bug!
OK, both those points are fixed in git.
Less than an hour between the report and the fix! But I'm not even sure
it's a new record...