Re: [Gretl-devel] pre-release testing for gretl 1.8.0

I do agree with Ignacio - we should try to translate as much as we can, including labels of auto-generated variables. Allin, in the first .diff I've sent was one change for 'pca.c' that wasn't applied for CVS. I hope it was missed accidentally :). Sending it once again in separate file. Ignacio Diaz-Emparanza wrote: El Thursday 15 January 2009 16:15:52 Allin Cottrell escribió: On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Allin Cottrell wrote: On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Alexander B. Gedranovich wrote: Also, I've marked some untranslated strings (see .diff attached) Thanks. I've applied most of the changes. But one sort of change maybe wants some discussion: namely, should we be translating the descriptive labels we write out for new variables created by, for example, the filter functions? As in, "4-period moving average of foo" I'm not sure we're fully consistent on this. Just checking. Allin. In my opinion, we should try to translate as much as we can through the xx.po files (through gettext). If I had more free time, I would like to translate the information in the data files (variable names, descriptive labels,... ). ... although it seems not possible in the short term ;-)) _______________________________________________ Gretl-devel mailing list Gretl-devel(a)lists.wfu.edu http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-devel