On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 9:39 AM Sven Schreiber
<sven.schreiber(a)fu-berlin.de> wrote:
Am 15.06.26 um 13:15 schrieb Cottrell, Allin:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 4:23 AM Sven Schreiber
> <sven.schreiber(a)fu-berlin.de> wrote:
>> Am 14.06.2026 um 19:35 schrieb Cottrell, Allin:
>>>
>>> Note that the criterion in the "discrete" case is a bit more
liberal
>>> than the built-in isdiscrete() function. More details can be found in
>>> the current version of pkgbook.pdf (or pkgbook-a4.pdf).
>>>
>> Thanks, Allin - but any reason why the two discreteness checks should be
>> different? (Sorry, haven't looked at pkgbook yet.)
> That point is debatable. Perhaps the isdiscrete() function should act
> in the "more liberal" way, since if you want to know whether a series
> is explicitly marked as discrete you can check the "discrete" member
> of the bundle returned by getinfo(). To see what exactly the more
> liberal variant does, take a look at gretl_isdiscrete() in
> gretl_utils.c.
>
>
Ah, so it seems to be about the discrete flag vs. the actual numerical
property. Perhaps the isdiscrete() function could get a second optional
argument to trigger the same factual check.
Let's talk about that the next time we meet.
Allin