Am 24.09.2018 um 16:18 schrieb Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2018, Sven Schreiber wrote:
It could be _marginally_ useful; the only case when I use count loops
is when I have to time things so some repetition is needed. Otherwise,
looping without being able to access the index is pretty useless to me.
If we want to allow
in place of
scalar C = A/B
I'd be fine with this, provided it's not too much work for the tokenizer.
If I understand correctly it's already allowed (but not documented). The
thing is that a syntax error can then lead the parser to think it's
intended as a count loop when it was a different kind of loop.