Re: [Gretl-devel] convolve function into extra?
Am 20.03.2019 um 01:49 schrieb Allin Cottrell:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2019, Sven Schreiber wrote:
>
> I wonder if this should be wrapped in a hansl function and added to the
> 'extra' addon, like this:
...
> As mentioned in the guide, the filter-based variant is indeed
about 30%
> faster in my examples.
The thread then diverged towards my "BTW" remark. So getting back to the
original question, should it go into 'extra'?
thanks
sven